|
|
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-03-186-CR
RONDEZ WILCOTS APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE
------------
FROM THE 362ND DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY
------------
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]
------------
Appellant=s sole issue in this appeal was that the trial court abused its discretion by refusing to hold a hearing on appellant=s motion for new trial. Having previously determined that appellant=s sole issue should be sustained, we abated this appeal and ordered the trial court to hold a hearing on appellant=s motion for new trial. The trial court did so and denied the motion.
Although we have given appellant an opportunity to file a supplemental brief addressing issues related to the trial court=s denial of his motion for new trial, he has declined to do so. He has not challenged any aspect of the trial court=s judgment other than the refusal to hold a hearing on the new trial motion. Accordingly, having previously sustained appellant=s sole issue on appeal, and granted him the full relief to which he was entitled on that issue,[2] we dismiss the appeal as moot. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f); Jack v. State, 149 S.W.3d 119, 123 n.10 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004).
PER CURIAM
PANEL A: LIVINGSTON, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and WALKER, J.
DO NOT PUBLISH
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: May 11, 2006
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
[2]See Tex. R. App. P. 44.4; Price v. State, 826 S.W.2d 947, 948 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992); Martinez v. State, 846 S.W.2d 345, 347 (Tex. App.CCorpus Christi 1992, order), disp. on merits, 846 S.W.2d 348 (Tex. App.CCorpus Christi 1992, pet. ref=d).