|
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-07-086-CV
SHELLY JO BISHOP APPELLANT
AND/OR ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS
V.
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEM, INC., APPELLEES
AS BENEFICIARY, AND MIDLAND MORTGAGE CO.,
AS SERVICER, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS
----------
FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF DENTON COUNTY
----------
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT
----------
On July 24, 2007, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. We have not received any response.
Because appellant=s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).
PER CURIAM
PANEL D: HOLMAN, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.
DELIVERED: August 16, 2007
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.