Marcus J. Kirby and Antoinette Backhaus D/B/A Marcus & Company v. Ron Rittenhouse D/B/A Amerifleet

 

 

 

 

 

 

                           COURT OF APPEALS

                                       SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                   FORT WORTH

 

                                        NO. 2-07-126-CV

 

MARCUS J. KIRBY AND ANTOINETTE                                   APPELLANTS

BACKHAUS D/B/A MARCUS & COMPANY

 

                                                   V.

 

RON RITTENHOUSE D/B/A AMERIFLEET                                     APPELLEE

                                                                                                       

                                               ----------

             FROM THE 89TH DISTRICT COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY

                                               ----------

                  MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT

                                               ----------

We have considered the parties= AMotion For Dismissal.@  It is the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL D:  DAUPHINOT, HOLMAN, and GARDNER, JJ.

 


DELIVERED:  May 3, 2007



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.