Marcus J. Kirby and Antoinette Backhaus D/B/A Marcus & Company v. Ron Rittenhouse D/B/A Amerifleet

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-07-126-CV

MARCUS J. KIRBY AND ANTOINETTE APPELLANTS

BACKHAUS D/B/A MARCUS & COMPANY

V.

RON RITTENHOUSE D/B/A AMERIFLEET APPELLEE

----------

FROM THE 89 TH DISTRICT COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION (footnote: 1) AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered the parties’ “Motion For Dismissal.”  It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.   See T EX. R. A PP. P. 42.1(a)(2), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same , for which let execution issue.   See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL D:  DAUPHINOT, HOLMAN, and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED:  May 3, 2007

FOOTNOTES

1:

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.