Domingo Lucio Hernandez A/K/A Domingo Hernandez v. State

 

 

 

 

 

                                      COURT OF APPEALS

                                       SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                   FORT WORTH

 

                                        NO. 2-07-091-CR

 

DOMINGO LUCIO HERNANDEZ                                               APPELLANT

A/K/A DOMINGO HERNANDEZ

 

                                                   V.

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS                                                                STATE

 

                                              ------------

 

           FROM THE 372ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

 

                                              ------------

 

                                MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]

 

                                              ------------

On February 23, 2007, appellant Domingo Lucio Hernandez a/k/a Domingo Hernandez pled guilty to indecency with a child.  See Tex. Penal Code Ann. ' 21.11(a), (c) (Vernon 2003).  Pursuant to a plea agreement, he was sentenced to two years= confinement.


On February 23, 2007, the trial court entered its certification of defendant=s right to appeal in accordance with rule 25.2(a)(2).  Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).  The certification states that appellant Ahas waived the right of appeal.@

Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal on March 16, 2007 challenging his conviction.  On March 23, 2007, we notified appellant that the certification indicating that he had waived his right to appeal had been filed in this court and that the appeal would be dismissed unless appellant or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), 44.3.  Appellant filed a response; however, it does not show grounds for continuing the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2)(A)B(B); Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006); Blanco v. State, 18 S.W.3d 218, 219-20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000); Estrada v. State, 149 S.W.3d 280, 285 (Tex. App.CHouston [1st Dist.] 2004, pet. ref=d).

Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), 43.2(f).

 

PER CURIAM

 

PANEL D:   LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.

 

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

 

DELIVERED: April 26, 2007



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.