Johnnie N. Daniels and Randle C. Daniels v. Board of Adjustment of the City of Fort Worth, Texas

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                      COURT OF APPEALS

                                       SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                   FORT WORTH

 

                                        NO. 2-06-279-CV

JOHNNIE N. DANIELS AND                                                  APPELLANTS

RANDLE C. DANIELS

 

                                                   V.

 

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF                                                   APPELLEE

THE CITY OF FORT WORTH, TEXAS

 

                                               ----------

            FROM THE 342ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

                                               ----------

                  MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT

                                               ----------

On March 23, 2007, we notified appellants that their briefs had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a).  TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a).  We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellants or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  We have not received any response.


Because appellants= briefs have not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

Appellants shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

 

PER CURIAM              

 

 

PANEL D:  MCCOY, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and LIVINGSTON, J.

 

DELIVERED:  April 12, 2007

 



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.