COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-06-458-CR
SAMUEL LLOYD UNDERWOOD A/K/A APPELLANT
SAMUEL LLOYD UNDERWOOD, III
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE
------------
FROM THE 355TH DISTRICT COURT OF HOOD COUNTY
------------
MEMORANDUM OPINION (footnote: 1)
------------
Samuel Lloyd Underwood, a/k/a Samuel Lloyd Underwood, III is attempting to appeal his conviction and sentence for possession of a controlled substance. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Appellant’s sentence was imposed on August 10, 2006, and no motion for new trial was filed. Therefore, appellant’s notice of appeal was due September 11, 2006; (footnote: 2) however, the notice of appeal was not filed until December 14, 2006. On January 3, 2007, we notified appellant by letter of our concern that we lack jurisdiction over the appeal. Although appellant filed a response, it does not state grounds for continuing the appeal. (footnote: 3) Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
PANEL D: CAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON and DAUPHINOT, JJ.
DO NOT PUBLISH
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: February 8, 2007
FOOTNOTES
1:
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2:
See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a).
3:
See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). We note that appellant’s remedy is to petition the court of criminal appeals for a writ of habeas corpus granting an out-of-time appeal. See Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 525 n.8; Ex parte Axel, 757 S.W.2d 369, 374-75 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988).