Steven Wayne Wilson v. State

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                      COURT OF APPEALS

                                       SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                   FORT WORTH

 

 

                                        NO. 2-07-232-CR

 

 

STEVEN WAYNE WILSON                                                     APPELLANT

 

                                                   V.

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS                                                                STATE

 

                                              ------------

 

              FROM THE 271ST DISTRICT COURT OF WISE COUNTY

 

                                              ------------

 

                                MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]

 

                                              ------------


Appellant pleaded guilty to the offense of aggravated sexual assault of a child on October 2, 2006.  Pursuant to a plea bargain, the trial court placed appellant on ten years= deferred adjudication.  On March 22, 2007, the State moved to proceed to adjudication, alleging that appellant violated the terms and conditions of his community supervision by, among other things, having contact with an unchaperoned child under the age of seventeen and accepting and maintaining employment which brought him in contact with children. 

After a hearing on the State=s motion to adjudicate on May 29, 2007, the trial court found four of the State=s allegations to be true, adjudicated appellant guilty of aggravated sexual assault of a child, and sentenced him to twenty years= confinement.  Appellant attempts to appeal from this adjudication.

At the time of the hearing on the motion to adjudicate, however, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 42.12, section 5(b), provided that A[n]o appeal may be taken from this determination [to adjudicate guilt].@[2]  It is well-settled under this statute that a defendant has no right to appeal an adjudication of guilt.[3]  Because of this prohibition against a direct appeal of the determination to adjudicate, we lack jurisdiction to consider appellant=s points.[4]


Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.[5]

 

PER CURIAM

 

PANEL A:  CAYCE, C.J.; GARDNER and WALKER, JJ.

 

DO NOT PUBLISH       

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

 

DELIVERED:  June 5, 2008                                 



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

[2]Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 42.12, ' 5(b) (Vernon 2006).  Although the legislature has since amended this section, the new version applies only to hearings conducted on or after June 15, 2007.  Act of May 28, 2007, 80th Leg., R.S., ch. 1308, '' 5, 53, 2007 Tex. Gen. Laws 4395, 4397, 4413B14.

[3]E.g., Davis v. State, 195 S.W.3d 708, 709 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (holding that generally Athere is no appeal from a trial court=s determination to adjudicate guilt because there is a statutory prohibition against it@); Henderson v. State, 132 S.W.3d 112, 114 (Tex. App.CDallas 2004, no pet.); Abdallah v. State, 924 S.W.2d 751, 754B55 (Tex. App.CFort Worth 1996, pet. ref=d).

[4]See Davis, 195 S.W.3d at 710; Trevino v. State, 962 S.W.2d 176, 177 (Tex. App.CFort Worth 1998, pet. ref=d).

[5]Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f); see Henderson, 132 S.W.3d at 114; Abdallah, 924 S.W.2d at 755.