Jay Kurtis Gray and Gray Law, L.L.P. v. Katheryn Ann Gray

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                      COURT OF APPEALS

                                       SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                   FORT WORTH

 

 

                                        NO. 2-07-099-CV

 

 

JAY KURTIS GRAY                                                            APPELLANTS

AND GRAY LAW, L.L.P.

                                                   V.

 

KATHERYN ANN GRAY                                                           APPELLEE

 

                                              ------------

 

           FROM THE 322ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

 

                                              ------------

 

                  MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT

 

                                              ------------

Appellants Jay Kurtis Gray (AJay@) and Gray Law L.L.P. (AGray Law@) appeal the trial court=s final decree of divorce.  Jay has appeared pro se and as attorney for Gray Law.


The appeal was submitted without oral argument before a panel of the court on November 27, 2007.  On that day, we notified appellants by letter that the court was concerned that the appeal is moot because it appears that the proceeds from the sale of the property in dispute previously held in the registry of the court have been disbursed in accordance with this court=s prior opinion in case No. 02-05-00379-CV, issued April 20, 2006.[2]  We stated that Aunless the appellant or any party desiring to continue the appeal files with the court on or before Friday, December 7, 2007 a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal, this appeal will be dismissed as moot.@  Jay responded in writing that he and appellant Gray Law have no objection to the appeal being dismissed as moot. 

        Because Jay and Gray Law have no objection to the appeal being dismissed as moot, it is ordered that the appeal is dismissed as moot.[3]  It is further ordered that appellants Jay Kurtis Gray and Gray Law, L.L.P. shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.[4]

 

PER CURIAM

 

PANEL A:  CAYCE, C.J.; HOLMAN and MCCOY, JJ.

 

DELIVERED:  January 10, 2008                                    



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

[2]In re Gray Law, L.L.P., No. 02-05-00379-CV, 2006 WL 1030206 (Tex. App.CFort Worth Apr. 20, 2006, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.).

[3]See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2), 43.2(f); see also Garcia v. Gonzales, No. 02-07-00158-CV, 2007 WL 3408640, at *1 (Tex. App.CFort Worth Nov. 15, 2007, no pet. h.) (mem. op.). 

[4]See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.