COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-08-401-CR
JUAN CARLOS FLORES APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE
------------
FROM THE 297TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
------------
MEMORANDUM OPINION 1
------------
After Appellant Juan Carlos Flores pled guilty pursuant to a plea bargain
to burglary of a habitation, the trial court placed him on five years’ deferred
adjudication community supervision and imposed a $500 fine. Less than a year
later, the State filed a petition to proceed to adjudication and amended it about
six months later. Appellant entered an open plea of “true-but” to the State’s
1
… See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
allegations in the petition that he had violated the conditions of his community
supervision by using marijuana and by failing to complete counseling and “not
true” to the allegation that he had committed a new offense. The trial court
found all three allegations true, adjudicated Appellant’s guilt, and sentenced him
to five years’ confinement.
Appellant’s court-appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to
withdraw as counsel and a brief in support of that motion. In the brief, counsel
avers that, in his professional opinion, this appeal is frivolous. Counsel’s brief
and motion meet the requirements of Anders v. California 2 by presenting a
professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable
grounds for relief.3 This court afforded Appellant the opportunity to file a brief
on his own behalf, but he did not.
Once an appellant’s court-appointed counsel files a motion to withdraw
on the ground that the appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of
Anders, we are obligated to undertake an independent examination of the
record and to essentially rebrief the case for the appellant to see if there is any
2
… 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967).
3
… See Mays v. State, 904 S.W.2d 920, 922–23 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth
1995, no pet.).
2
arguable ground that may be raised on his behalf.4 Only then may we grant
counsel’s motion to withdraw.5
We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. We agree
with counsel that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. We find
nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. 6 Consequently,
we grant the motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgment.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: DAUPHINOT, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and MEIER, J.
DO NOT PUBLISH
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: June 18, 2009
4
… Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991);
Mays, 904 S.W.2d at 923.
5
… See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83–84, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351–52
(1988).
6
… See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
3