Kendrick Lee Jones v. State

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                      COURT OF APPEALS

                                       SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                   FORT WORTH

 

 

 

                                        NO.  2-09-101-CR

 

 

 

KENDRICK LEE JONES                                                          APPELLANT

 

 

                                                   V.

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS                                                                STATE

 

 

                                              ------------

 

 

             FROM THE 78TH DISTRICT COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY

 

 

                                              ------------

 

 

                                MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]

 

 

                                              ------------


Appellant Kendrick Lee Jones attempts to appeal the trial court=s judgment sentencing him to ten years= imprisonment for robbery.  We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

The trial court imposed Appellant=s sentence on November 8, 2007.  Appellant filed a timely motion for new trial; thus, his notice of appeal was due within ninety daysCthat is, on or before February 6, 2008.  See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1).  Appellant did not file his notice of appeal until April 8, 2009Cover a year late.

On April 13, 2009, we notified Appellant that because of the apparent untimeliness of his appeal, we would dismiss the appeal unless he or any party desiring to continue the appeal responded by April 23, 2009, and showed grounds for continuing the appeal.  Appellant did not file a response.


The lack of a timely notice of appeal deprives this court of jurisdiction.  See State v. Riewe, 13 S.W.3d 408, 410 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522B23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Williams v. State, 76 S.W.3d 207, 209 (Tex. App.CFort Worth 2002, no pet.).  Therefore, because Appellant failed to timely file his notice of appeal and failed to provide us with grounds for continuing his appeal, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.[2]  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

 

PER CURIAM

 

PANEL:  GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

 

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

 

DELIVERED:  May 21, 2009



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

[2]We note that Appellant is not without recourse because he may seek an out-of-time appeal by filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus with the court of criminal appeals.  See, e.g., Ex parte Pinner, No. AP-75802, 2007 WL 4305516, at *1 (Tex. Crim. App. Dec. 5, 2007) (not designated for publication) (holding that habeas corpus applicant whose attorney had failed to timely file a written notice of appeal was entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal to his judgment of conviction); see generally Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (Vernon Supp. 2008).