|
|
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-09-044-CV
IN RE DAVID MICHAEL SHEID RELATOR
------------
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
------------
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]
------------
The court has considered relator=s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. A party is entitled to findings of fact and conclusions of law after a conventional trial on the merits before the court. See IKB Indus. (Nigeria) Ltd. v. Pro‑Line Corp., 938 S.W.2d 440, 442 (Tex. 1997). The record reflects that the respondent ruled on relator=s bill of review after the State sought a ruling. Because there was no evidentiary hearing or trial on the merits, there could have been no findings of fact and any conclusions of law would have been only advisory. See id. Accordingly, relator=s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and MCCOY, JJ.
DELIVERED: March 6, 2009
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.