AT AUSTIN
NO. 3-93-145-CR
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
APPELLANT
vs.
MONICA GRIFFIN,
APPELLEE
FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF HAYS COUNTY
NO. 36,672, HONORABLE HOWARD S. WARNER, II, JUDGE PRESIDING
PER CURIAM
The State appeals an order suppressing evidence. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 44.01(a)(5) (West Supp. 1993). The underlying offense is driving while intoxicated. Tex. Rev. Civ. Stat. Ann. art. 6701l-1 (West Supp. 1993).
Appellee was stopped and arrested by Southwest Texas State University police officer Robert Drozd. Drozd testified that he observed appellee driving erratically on Sessoms Drive. The stop "was on State Street which borders -- which borders Sessoms and goes into Southwest Texas property." Sessoms Drive is a public street. In her motion to suppress, appellee contended that the campus police officer did not have jurisdiction to arrest her because he was not on university property.
In its first point of error, the State contends that the Education Code extends the territorial jurisdiction of campus police officers beyond the physical limits of university property. Tex. Educ. Code Ann. § 51.203 (West Supp. 1993). We recently reached the same conclusion. State v. Carroll, No. 3-92-640-CR (Tex. App.--Austin May 19, 1993, no pet. h.). For the reasons stated in Carroll, the county court at law erred by finding that Drozd was without jurisdiction to arrest appellee. Point of error one is sustained.
The State's second point of error asserts that the court erred by finding that no probable cause existed for the stop of appellee's car. Lack of probable cause was not raised in appellee's motion to suppress or at the hearing on the motion. This point of error presents nothing for review.
The order of the county court at law granting appellee's motion to suppress evidence is reversed and the cause is remanded to that court for further proceedings.
[Before Justices Powers, Kidd and B. A. Smith]
Reversed and Remanded
Filed: July 7, 1993
[Do Not Publish]