TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-98-00132-CR
Francisco D. Acevedo, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY, 119TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. B-95-0340-S, HONORABLE BARBARA WALTHER, JUDGE PRESIDING
PER CURIAMIn October 1995, appellant pleaded guilty and judicially confessed to aggravated assault. Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.02 (West 1994). Pursuant to a plea bargain, the district court deferred adjudication and placed appellant on community supervision. In December 1997, following a hearing on the State's motion, the court revoked supervision, adjudicated appellant guilty, and sentenced him to imprisonment for eight years.
Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.
We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. Further, we find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Before Chief Justice Yeakel, Justices Jones and B. A. Smith
Affirmed
Filed: October 29, 1998
Do Not Publish