TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
NO. 0975265, HONORABLE MIKE LYNCH, JUDGE PRESIDING
This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction for robbery. Sentence was imposed on May 5, 1998. The deadline for either perfecting appeal or moving for a new trial was therefore June 4, 1998. Tex. R. App. P. 21.4, 26.2(a)(1). Both a motion for new trial and notice of appeal were filed on June 5, one day late. Because the motion for new trial was not timely, it did not serve to extend the time for filing the notice of appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(2). No extension of time for filing notice of appeal was requested. Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. There is no indication that notice of appeal was properly mailed to the district clerk within the time prescribed by rule 26.2(a). Tex. R. App. P. 9.2(b). Under the circumstances, we lack jurisdiction to dispose of the purported appeal in any manner other than by dismissing it for want of jurisdiction. See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). But see Williams v. State, 957 S.W.2d 949 (Tex. App.--Austin 1997, no pet.) (asking that Olivo be reexamined).
The appeal is dismissed.
Before Chief Justice Yeakel, Justices Jones and B. A. Smith
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: September 11, 1998
Do Not Publish