TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-99-00443-CR
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
NOS. 46,011 & 49,755, HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING
Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeals are frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.
We have reviewed the records and counsel's brief and agree that the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the records that might arguably support the appeals.
In number 3-99-442-CR, the order revoking community supervision is affirmed. In number 3-99-443-CR, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Mack Kidd, Justice
Before Justices Jones, Kidd and Patterson
Affirmed on Both Causes
Filed: November 4, 1999
Do Not Publish