TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Anthony George Williams, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. 48,505, HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING
PER CURIAM
Appellant Anthony George Williams pleaded guilty and judicially confessed to delivering less than four grams of cocaine. Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.112(a), (c) (West Supp. 1999). The district court adjudged him guilty and assessed punishment at imprisonment for fifteen years.
Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.
We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. Further, we find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices Kidd and Patterson
Affirmed
Filed: March 25, 1999
Do Not Publish