Penigar v. Bell Helicopter

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 02-10172 Conference Calendar KIERON DEREK PENIGAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON INC, Defendant-Appellee. -------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:01-CV-473-A -------------------- August 20, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Kieron Derek Penigar, Texas prisoner # 721657, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights complaint for lack of jurisdiction. This court previously dismissed Penigar’s suit for lack of federal jurisdiction. See Penigar v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., No. 01-10864 (5th Cir. Dec. 28, 2001) (unpublished). The law of the case doctrine bars the re- examination of an issue that this court has previously decided. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-10172 -2- See Free v. Abbott Labs. Inc., 164 F.3d 270, 271-72 (5th Cir. 1999). Penigar fails to establish any credible exception to this doctrine. See id. The dismissal of this appeal as frivolous counts as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). In addition, Penigar accumulated two strikes with the dismissal of the appeal in Penigar v. Johnson, No. 01-11290 (5th Cir. Feb. 20, 2002) (unpublished). Because he has accumulated three strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), Penigar is BARRED from proceeding in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); Carson v. Johnson, 112 F.3d 818, 819 (5th Cir. 1997). APPEAL DISMISSED; THREE-STRIKES BAR IMPOSED.