TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
NO. 9024128, HONORABLE JULIE H. KOCUREK, JUDGE PRESIDING
The first attorney appointed to represent Jackson did not file a notice of appeal on Jackson's behalf. On September 18, five days before the deadline for perfecting appeal, substitute counsel was appointed. This attorney, Jackson's current counsel of record, did not file a notice of appeal. Jackson's pro se notice of appeal was filed on September 24, 2002, one day late. No extension of time for perfecting appeal was requested. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. Although the pro se notice of appeal is dated September 22, 2002, there is no indication that it was properly mailed to the district clerk within the time prescribed by rule 26.2(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 9.2(b).
Under the circumstances, we lack jurisdiction to dispose of the purported appeal in any manner other than by dismissing it for want of jurisdiction. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App.1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522-23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Jackson must obtain an out-of-time appeal by means of a post-conviction habeas corpus application. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2002).
The appeal is dismissed.
David Puryear, Justice
Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices Patterson and Puryear
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: November 7, 2002
Do Not Publish