TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-02-00457-CR
Juan Cuadrado, Jr., Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. 50,419, HONORABLE JOE CARROLL, JUDGE PRESIDING
Appellant Juan Cuadrado, Jr., was placed on deferred adjudication community supervision
after he pleaded guilty to aggravated robbery. The district court later revoked supervision and adjudicated
him guilty after he admitted most of the violations alleged in the State=s motion to adjudicate. The court
sentenced Cuadrado to seven years= imprisonment.
Cuadrado=s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and
without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by
presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be
advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim.
App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d
553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). A copy of
counsel=s brief was delivered to Cuadrado, and he was advised of his right to examine the appellate record
and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.
We have reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous and
without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Bea Ann Smith, Justice
Before Justices Kidd, B. A. Smith and Yeakel
Affirmed
Filed: October 24, 2002
Do Not Publish
Juan Cuadrado Jr. v. State
Combined Opinion