TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-02-00165-CR
Gary Alan Reeves, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF ARCHER COUNTY, 97TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. 01-04-0018A-CR, HONORABLE ROGER E. TOWERY, JUDGE PRESIDING
After appellant Gary Alan Reeves pleaded guilty to burglary of a habitation and sexual
assault, the district court adjudged him guilty and imposed sentences of forty years= imprisonment for the
burglary and twenty years= imprisonment for the sexual assault. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. '' 22.011.
30.02 (West Supp. 2002). Appellant=s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is
frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable
grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807
(Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State,
485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969).
A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised of his right to examine the
appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.
We have reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous and
without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Counsel=s motion to
withdraw is granted.
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
__________________________________________
Marilyn Aboussie, Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices B. A. Smith and Yeakel
Affirmed
Filed: August 30, 2002
Do Not Publish
2