TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. J-18491, HONORABLE JOHN K. DIETZ, JUDGE PRESIDING
J.R.V.'s appointed counsel on appeal filed a brief asserting that the appeal is frivolous. The brief complies with the requirements for such briefs discussed in In Re D.A.S., 973 S.W.2d 296 (Tex. 1998); and, more generally, in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel states that he has diligently examined the record and researched the law applicable to the facts and issues in the case. Counsel's brief contains a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no meritorious errors to be advanced. A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to J.R.V. and to his guardian, and they were advised of their right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. A pro se brief was not filed. We have independently reviewed the record and agree with counsel that the appeal is frivolous.
We grant counsel's motion to withdraw from the case and affirm the juvenile court's disposition order.
Bea Ann Smith, Justice
Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices B. A. Smith and Yeakel
Affirmed
Filed: February 22, 2002
Do Not Publish