TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
NO. B-03-0150-S, HONORABLE BARBARA L. WALTHER, JUDGE PRESIDING
PER CURIAM
Appellant's court-appointed counsel has tendered a brief in which he states that this appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); see also High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). There is no indication, however, that counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant, or that he advised appellant of his right to examine the record and file a pro se brief. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744. Counsel did not respond to the Clerk's notice seeking to resolve this problem informally.
Counsel for appellant, Mr. Daniel A. Edwards, if he has not already done so, is ordered to deliver a copy of his brief to appellant and to advise him of his right to examine the record and file a pro se brief. Counsel shall certify to this Court in writing that he has complied with this order no later than December 5, 2003.
It is ordered November 20, 2003.
Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Kidd and Puryear
Do Not Publish