TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-02-00663-CR
NO. 03-02-00664-CR
Jeremiah Oliver, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURTS OF TOM GREEN COUNTY
51ST & 119TH JUDICIAL DISTRICTS, NOS. B-01-0274-S & A-01-0571-S
HONORABLE RAE LEIFESTE, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Jeremiah Oliver was placed on deferred adjudication community supervision after
he pleaded guilty to sexually assaulting a child and failing to appear. Tex. Pen. Code Ann. ''
22.011(a)(2)(A), 38.10 (West 2003). He later pleaded true to the allegations in the State=s motions to
revoke and adjudicate. Oliver was adjudged guilty of both offenses and sentenced to imprisonment for five
years.
Oliver=s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeals are frivolous and
without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by
presenting a professional evaluation of the records demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be
advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim.
App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d
553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Oliver
received a copy of counsel=s brief, and he was advised of his right to examine the appellate records and to
file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.
We have reviewed the records and counsel=s brief and agree that the appeals are frivolous
and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeals. Counsel=s motion
to withdraw is granted.
The judgments of conviction are affirmed.
__________________________________________
Bea Ann Smith, Justice
Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Puryear
Affirmed
Filed: March 20, 2003
Do Not Publish
2