No. 04-98-00229-CR
Everett Earl ROBINSON, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 94-CR-4895 Honorable James E. Barlow, Judge Presiding
Opinion by: Sarah B. Duncan, Justice
Sitting: Tom Rickhoff, Justice
Sarah B. Duncan, Justice
Karen Angelini, Justice
Delivered and Filed: November 12, 1998
MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; AFFIRMED
On November 23, 1994, pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, Everett Earl Robinson pled guilty to burglary of a habitation. In accordance with the recommendation in the agreement, the trial court sentenced Robinson to five years imprisonment and a $1,000 fine, suspended the sentence, and placed Robinson on community supervision for five years. On February 17, 1998, Robinson pled true to six of eight allegations in the State's first amended motion to revoke probation. The trial court found Robinson violated the terms and conditions of his community supervision and sentenced him to five years incarceration in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Institutional Division. Robinson perfected this appeal.
Robinson's court-appointed appellate attorney filed a brief in which he raises no arguable points of error and concludes that this appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978), and Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Counsel states Robinson was provided with a copy of the brief and motion to withdraw. Robinson was informed of his right to review the record and file his own brief if he wished. Robinson has not done so.
We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Furthermore, we grant the motion to withdraw filed by Robinson's counsel. See Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1997, pet. ref'd); Bruns, 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1.
Sarah B. Duncan
DO NOT PUBLISH
Return to
4th Court of Appeals Opinions