MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-05-00765-CV
IN RE David R. SALINAS
Original Mandamus Proceeding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Alma L. López, Chief Justice
Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Rebecca Simmons, Justice
Delivered and Filed: December 21, 2005
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
On October 25, 2005, David R. Salinas filed a petition for a writ of mandamus complaining of the trial court’s order dismissing his motion for judgment nunc pro tunc based on a lack of jurisdiction. Mandamus may issue only to correct a clear abuse of discretion when there is no adequate remedy at law. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). In his motion, Salinas represented that he had served time in federal prison on an unrelated matter years after his sentence was imposed in the underlying case. Salinas asked the convicting court to credit this time to his sentence by way of a judgment nunc pro tunc. A trial court may correct an error in applying pre-sentence jail credit by judgment nunc pro tunc. Ex parte Ybarra, 149 S.W.3d 147, 148 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). However, such a procedure is inappropriate for crediting time served after sentencing. See Ex parte Dunlap, 166 S.W.3d 268, 269 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Ex parte Russell, 60 S.W.3d 875, 876-77 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001). Therefore, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Salinas’ motion for judgment nunc pro tunc. Additionally, other remedies are available to resolve any possible errors in crediting Salinas’ sentence. See Tex. Crim. Proc. Code Ann. art. 11.07 (Vernon 2005); Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 501.0081 (Vernon 2004). Accordingly, Salinas’ petition for a writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
PER CURIAM