i i i i i i
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-09-00426-CR
Lorenzo GARCIA III,
Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas,
Appellee
From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2001-CR-4655A
Honorable Juanita A. Vasquez-Gardner, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice
Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice
Delivered and Filed: August 26, 2009
DISMISSED
Pursuant to a plea-bargain agreement, Lorenzo Garcia III pled nolo contendere to murder and
two counts of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon (repeater) and was sentenced to thirty years
imprisonment and a $2000 fine in accordance with the terms of his plea-bargain agreement. On July
14, 2009, the trial court signed a certification of defendant’s right to appeal stating that this “is a
plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(a)(2). After
04-09-00426-CR
Garcia filed a notice of appeal, the trial court clerk sent copies of the certification and notice of
appeal to this court. See id. 25.2(e). The clerk’s record, which includes the trial court’s Rule
25.2(a)(2) certification, has been filed. See id. 25.2(d).
“In a plea bargain case ... a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were raised by
written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or (B) after getting the trial court’s permission to
appeal.” Id. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record, which contains a written plea bargain, establishes the
punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor
and agreed to by the defendant. See id. The clerk’s record does not include a written motion filed and
ruled upon before trial; nor does it indicate that the trial court gave its permission to appeal. See id.
The trial court’s certification, therefore, appears to accurately reflect that this is a plea-bargain case
and that Garcia does not have a right to appeal. We must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that
shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” Id. 25.2(d).
We, therefore, warned Garcia that this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to Texas Rule of
Appellate Procedure 25.2(d), unless an amended trial court certification showing that he had the right
to appeal was made part of the appellate record. See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d), 37.1; Daniels v. State,
110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order). No such amended trial court certification
has been filed. This appeal is, therefore, dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d).
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-