i i i i i i
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-08-00809-CR
Martin MARROQUIN,
Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas,
Appellee
From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2008-CR-3428
Honorable Sharon MacRae, Judge Presiding
Opinion by: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice
Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice
Delivered and Filed: July 15, 2009
AFFIRMED
Defendant, Martin Marroquin, originally pled guilty to aggravated sexual assault of a child
pursuant to a plea bargain. However, the trial court informed defendant it would not follow the plea
agreement and allowed defendant the opportunity to withdraw his plea. Defendant indicated he did
not wish to withdraw his plea, and he pled guilty to aggravated sexual assault. The trial court
assessed punishment at twenty-five years’ confinement.
04-08-00809-CR
Defendant’s court-appointed appellate attorney filed a brief containing a professional
evaluation of the record and demonstrating that there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.
Counsel concludes that the appeal is without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Defendant was informed of his right to review the record. Counsel
provided defendant with a copy of the brief and advised him of his right to file a pro se brief.
Defendant did not file a pro se brief.
After reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and
without merit. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s judgment, and we GRANT appellate
counsel’s motion to withdraw.1 Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 86 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997,
no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.).
Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
DO NOT PUBLISH
1
… No substitute counsel will be appointed. See In re Schulman, 252 S.W .3d 403, 408 n.22 (Tex. Crim. App.
2008). Should defendant wish to seek further review of this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, defendant
must either retain an attorney to file a petition for discretionary review or file a pro se petition for discretionary review.
Any petition for discretionary review must be filed within thirty days from the date of either this opinion or the last timely
motion for rehearing that is overruled by this court. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must
be filed with this court, after which it will be forwarded to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals along with the rest of
the filings in this case. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 68.3. Any petition for discretionary review must comply with the
requirements of Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 68.4.
-2-
Martin Marroquin v. State
Combined Opinion