i i i i i i
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-09-00264-CV
IN RE ADT MEXICO SECURITY SERVICES, S.A. DE C.V.
Original Mandamus Proceeding1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice
Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice
Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Delivered and Filed: May 20, 2009
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
On May 8, 2009, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus, complaining of the trial
court’s April 24, 2009 order imposing sanctions. The court has considered relators’ petition for writ
of mandamus. The court is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought because
relator has an adequate remedy by appeal. See Braden v. Downey, 811 S.W.2d 922, 928 (Tex. 1991);
In re Lavernia Nursing Facility, 12 S.W.3d 566, 571 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1999, orig.
proceeding [mand. denied]) (monetary sanctions are generally not remediable by mandamus).
Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX . R. APP . P. 52.8(a).
… This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2006-CVQ-001051-D2, styled ADT Security Services, S.A. de C.V.
1
v. Alert 24, LLC, et al., pending in the 111th District Court, W ebb County, Texas, the Honorable Raul Vasquez presiding.
PER CURIAM
-2-