i i i i i i
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-08-00638-CR
Guadalupe Dionicio CANTU,
Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas,
Appellee
From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2006-CR-2113
Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding
Opinion by: Karen Angelini, Justice
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
Karen Angelini, Justice
Rebecca Simmons, Justice
Delivered and Filed: March 18, 2009
AFFIRMED
Pursuant to a plea-bargain agreement, Guadalupe Dionicio Cantu pled guilty to possession
of a controlled substance and received deferred adjudication community supervision for four years.
The State then filed a motion to enter adjudication of guilt and revoke community supervision. At
the hearing on the motion, Cantu pled true to having violated the conditions of his community
supervision and was sentenced to three years imprisonment. Cantu timely filed a notice of appeal.
04-08-00638-CR
Cantu’s court-appointed appellate attorney has filed a brief in which she concludes that this
appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State,
573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). Counsel states that appellant was provided with a copy of
the brief and motion to withdraw and was further informed of his right to review the record and file
his own brief. See Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.).
Cantu did not file a pro se brief.
We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. We agree that the appeal is frivolous and
without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Furthermore, we grant the motion to
withdraw. See Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85-86 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.);
Bruns, 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1.
No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should appellant wish to seek further review of this
case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, he must either retain an attorney to file a petition for
discretionary review or must file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for
discretionary review must be filed within thirty days from the date of either this opinion or the last
timely motion for rehearing that is overruled by this court. See TEX . R. APP . P. 68.2. Any petition for
discretionary review must be filed with this court, after which it will be forwarded to the Texas Court
of Criminal Appeals along with the rest of the filings in this case. See TEX . R. APP . P. 68.3. Any
petition for discretionary review must comply with the requirements of Rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules
of Appellate Procedure. TEX . R. APP . P. 68.4.
Karen Angelini, Justice
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-