In The
Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
______________________________
No. 06-07-00208-CR ______________________________
VIDAL GARCIA, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 124th Judicial District Court Gregg County, Texas Trial Court No. 35121-B
Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Vidal Garcia has appealed from his conviction on his open plea of guilty to the offense of evading detention with a vehicle. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 38.04(b)(1) (Vernon 2003). The trial court sentenced Garcia to two years' confinement, to run concurrently with his fifteen-year sentence in a companion appeal. (1) See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 12.35 (Vernon Supp. 2007).
Because the issues raised in each appeal are identical, for the reasons stated in our opinion dated this day in Garcia v. State, cause number 06-07-00207-CR, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Josh R. Morriss, III
Chief Justice
Date Submitted: June 18, 2008
Date Decided: June 19, 2008
Do Not Publish
1. Garcia has a companion appeal pending before this Court in cause number 06-07-00207-CR concerning his conviction for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon.
e Procedure prescribes the time period in which a notice of appeal must be filed by a defendant in order to perfect appeal in a criminal case. A defendant's notice of appeal is timely if filed within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court, or within ninety days after sentencing if the defendant timely files a motion for new trial. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a); Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 522. Because no motion for new trial was filed, the last date Godlock could timely file his notice of appeal was July 7, 2008, thirty days after the day, according to his motion, the sentence was imposed in open court. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1); 4.1(b). Further, no motion for extension of time was filed in this Court within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing the notice of appeal.
Godlock has failed to perfect his appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Bailey C. Moseley
Justice
Date Submitted: August 19, 2008
Date Decided: August 20, 2008
Do Not Publish
1. Counsel filed an "Out of Time Notice of Appeal" on behalf of Godlock. In that notice of appeal, counsel states that Godlock requested and was appointed counsel for appeal on or about June 5, but appointed counsel was not notified by the trial court of the appointment until August 13.