IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL C
MARCH 13, 2001
______________________________
PRINCEWILL A. TATA, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
_________________________________
FROM THE 337TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY;
NO. 817,720; HONORABLE DON STRICKLIN, JUDGE
_______________________________
Before QUINN and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.
By opinion and order dated March 6, 2001, this appeal was abated and remanded to the trial court for further proceedings in regard to appellant's intent to prosecute the appeal and appellant's possible status as an indigent. The clerk of this court received, and on March 9, 2001, filed a Supplemental Clerk's Record. Contained in the Supplemental Clerk's Record were documents clearly indicating an intent to prosecute the appeal and an order of the judge of the 337th District Court of Harris County appointing counsel to represent appellant on appeal, and directing the court reporter to prepare a statement of facts.
Accordingly, our prior order of abatement and remand dated March 6, 2001, is withdrawn. The appeal is reinstated. The reporter's record is directed to be filed on or before April 4, 2001. Subsequent appellate filing times and deadlines shall be based on such due date for the reporter's record. Tex. R. App. P. 2.
Per Curiam.
Do not publish.
m:brkBinSub m:val="--"/>
NO. 07-10-00113-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL D
MAY 11, 2010
STEVEN J. REED, APPELLANT
v.
CITY OF LAGO VISTA, TEXAS AND ROGERS-PENN INVESTMENTS, APPELLEES
FROM THE 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY;
NO. D-1GN-08-004232; HONORABLE MARGARET A. COOPER, JUDGE
Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Steven J. Reed filed a notice of appeal on February 9, 2010. On April 7, the case was transferred to this court from the Third Court of Appeals under a docket equalization order of the Supreme Court of Texas. Reed has not paid the required filing fee of $175[1] or provided a status report concerning the record as specified by a March 29 letter from the clerk of the transferor court. By letter of April 20, we informed Reed that failure to satisfy these omissions within ten days of the letter would result in dismissal of this appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(c). We have had no response from Reed.
Finding Reed has failed to comply with a requirement of the Rules of Appellate Procedure and a notice from the clerk requiring a response, and finding that we have given notice to all parties, we dismiss the appeal pursuant to Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c).
James T. Campbell
Justice
[1] Tex. R. App. P. 5 & Appendix.