Eric Bouldwin v. State

NO. 07-02-0156-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS



FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



AT AMARILLO



PANEL E



OCTOBER 14, 2002



______________________________





ERIC DARNELL BOULDWIN, APPELLANT



V.



THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE





_________________________________



FROM THE 230TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY;



NO. 873010; HONORABLE JOAN CAMPBELL, JUDGE



_______________________________



Before REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ., and BOYD, SJ.

ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

On April 19, 2001, upon his plea of guilty, appellant Eric Darnell Bouldwin was adjudged guilty of the offense of possession of a controlled substance weighing more than four grams but less than 200 grams. In accordance with a plea bargain, he was placed on probation (community supervision) for a period of three years. On February 19, 2002, after hearing, appellant's probation was revoked and he was ordered to serve a three-year sentence in the Institutional Division of the Department of Criminal Justice and, in addition thereto, he was ordered to pay a fine of $500. On that same day, appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal.

On April 22, 2002, we received the clerk's record in the case. However, we have never received a reporter's record, nor have we received a motion for extension of time to file that record. On June 5, 2002, we notified appellant that we had not received an appellant's brief in this matter, which was due on May 22, 2002. After receiving the letter, appellant requested an extension of time which was granted until August 12, 2002. However, as of this date, we have not received a brief, nor a motion for extension of time to file the brief. We have also previously advised appellant that if no satisfactory responses were received, it would be necessary to abate the appeal to the trial court pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8. We have received no response to that notification.

This state of events necessitates a hearing to avoid further delay and preserve the parties' rights. See Tex. R. App. 38.8(b). Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand to the 230th District Court of Harris County for hearing. Upon remand, the judge of the trial court shall immediately cause notice to be given and conduct a hearing to determine:

1. Whether appellant has abandoned his appeal, and if not, whether appellant is indigent and if the appointment of an attorney is necessary. If an attorney is appointed, the name, address, and State Bar of Texas identification number of the attorney appointed should be provided to this court.



2. If appellant is not indigent and has failed to make arrangements to prosecute his appeal, what orders are necessary to ensure those arrangements are made.



3. Whether any other orders are steps are needed to ensure the diligent and proper pursuit of appellant's appeal.



In support of its determination, the trial court will prepare and file written findings of fact and conclusions of law and cause them to be included in a supplemental clerk's record. The hearing proceedings shall be transcribed and included in a supplemental reporter's record. Those supplemental records shall be submitted to the clerk of this court not later than November 14, 2002.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

ception Locked="false" Priority="60" Name="Light Shading"/>

NO. 07-11-0267-CR

                                                              

                                                   IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

 

                                       FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

                                                                 AT AMARILLO

 

                                                                      PANEL B

 

                                                               AUGUST 4, 2011

                                            ______________________________

 

                                               ROSHELLE RENE HOUSER a/k/a

ROSHELL RENEA JONES,

 

                                                                                                                        Appellant

 

                                                                             v.

 

                                                        THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 

                                                                                                                        Appellee

_______________________________

 

                           FROM THE 264th DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY;

 

                               NO. 66,191; HON. MARTHA J. TRUDO, PRESIDING

                                           _______________________________

                                                                             

                                                   ABATEMENT AND REMAND

                                           _______________________________

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

Roshelle Rene Houser a/k/a Roshell Renea Jones, appellant, appeals her conviction for forgery by passing.  Appellant timely perfected her appeal. The clerk’s record was filed on June 14, 2011, and no reporter’s record was taken.  Appellant’s brief was due on July 14, 2011.  The brief was not filed by that date and on July 22, 2011, the court notified counsel that he had until August 1, 2011, to either file appellant’s brief or file an extension motion.  To date, neither a brief nor an extension motion have been received by the court.

Those convicted of criminal acts are entitled to effective assistance of counsel on appeal.  The failure of counsel to timely prosecute an appeal falls short of rendering such assistance.  Consequently, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the 46th District Court of Bell County (trial court) for further proceedings.  Upon remand, the trial court shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to determine 1) whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, 2) whether appellant is indigent and entitled to appointed counsel, and 3) whether appellant’s current attorney was appointed or retained.  The trial court is ordered to execute pertinent findings of fact on these matters.  Should it be found that appellant desires to pursue the appeal, is indigent, and her current legal counsel was appointed, then the trial court is ordered to remove appellant’s current legal counsel and appoint another to zealously represent appellant’s interest on appeal.   The name, address, phone number, telefax number, and state bar number of the new attorney must also be included in the court's findings of fact and conclusions of law.  Lastly, the trial court shall also cause to be developed 1) a supplemental clerk's record containing the findings of fact and conclusions of law and 2) a reporter's record transcribing the evidence and argument presented at the aforementioned hearing.  The foregoing supplemental clerk's and reporter’s records must be filed by the trial court with the clerk of this court on or before September 2, 2011.  Should additional time be needed to perform these tasks, the trial court may request same on or before September 2, 2011.

It is so ordered.

                                                                                    Per Curiam

Do not publish.