NO. 07-02-0154-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL D
JULY 2, 2002
______________________________
In re J.A.G, a CHILD
______________________________
FROM THE 320th JUDICIAL DISTRICT FOR POTTER COUNTY;
NO. 62386-D; HON. DON EMERSON, PRESIDING
_____________________________
Before BOYD, C.J., QUINN and REAVIS, J.J.
Pending before the court is the motion by the Texas Department of Protective and
Regulatory Services (TDP) to dismiss the appeal of Leigh Goldsmith for want of
jurisdiction. The latter had attempted to appeal from an order signed on January 4, 2002,
terminating her parental relationship with J.A.G, a child. The notice of appeal was filed on
April 2, 2002.
Since September 1, 2001, statute mandates that appeals from decisions terminating
the parent / child relationship be treated as accelerated. TEX . FAM . CODE ANN . §263.405(a)
(Vernon Supp. 2002). Applicable rule of procedure, therefore, requires an appellant to file
the notice of appeal within 20 days after the judgment or order is signed. TEX . R. APP .
PROC . 26.1(b). More importantly, this time period is not extended by timely filed motions
for new trial or other post-judgment motions or requests for findings of fact and conclusions
of law. TEX . FAM . CODE ANN . §263.405(c).
Here, the final order terminating the parental rights of Goldsmith was signed on
January 4, 2002. Thus, her notice of appeal was due on or before January 25, 2002.
However, it was not filed until April of 2002. Since a timely motion to extend this time
period was not filed and because we lack the authority to modify the deadlines applicable
to perfecting an appeal, TEX . R. APP . PROC . 2, we cannot entertain the cause.
Accordingly, the motion of the TDP is granted and the cause is dismissed for want
of jurisdiction.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
2