Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.
Advanced Industries, Inc., appellant, and Cactus Operating Ltd. d/b/a Cactus Feeders, and Amistad Aviation, Inc., appellees, by and through their attorneys, have filed a motion to dismiss this appeal with prejudice because the parties have fully compromised and settled all issues in dispute and neither desire to pursue the appeal. Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(2) and dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at the parties' request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.
Brian Quinn
Chief Justice
ecoration: none; color: black; vertical-align: middle; text-indent: 0in } body { font-family: "Arial", sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; font-weight: normal; font-style: normal }
NO. 07-08-0433-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL B
NOVEMBER 25, 2008
______________________________
CARL VAN JOHNSON, APPELLANT
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
_________________________________
FROM THE 320TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;
NO. 54,470-D; HON. DON EMERSON, PRESIDING
_______________________________
Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Pursuant to a plea bargain, appellant, Carl Van Johnson, was convicted of burglary of a habitation and sentenced to 20 years incarceration in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a notice of appeal in which he requested appointment of appellate counsel. We dismiss for want of jurisdiction.
Appellant’s sentence was imposed on January 7, 2008. His notice of appeal bears a file stamp date from the District Clerk of July 21, 2008. Unless certain post-judgment motions are filed, a defendant must file a written notice of appeal with the trial court clerk within 30 days after the date sentence is imposed. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a). The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide for a 15-day extension in which to file a notice of appeal if it is accompanied by a motion for extension of time. Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. This Court is without jurisdiction to address the merits of an appeal and can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal if it is not timely perfected. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex.Crim.App. 1998). Appellant’s notice, which was filed more than seven months after sentence was imposed, is untimely and does not invoke our jurisdiction.
Accordingly, the purported appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Mackey K. Hancock
Justice