NO. 07-05-0159-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL D
MAY 25, 2005
______________________________
IN THE INTEREST OF A.R.M., A CHILD
_________________________________
FROM THE 237TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;
NO. 2001-516,052; HONORABLE SAM MEDINA, JUDGE
_______________________________
Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant James A. Miller filed a notice of accelerated appeal, received by the trial
court on April 18, 2005, stating that he was appealing a March 30, 2005 judgment
terminating his parent-child relationship with the minor child, A.R.M.1
The notice of appeal was received by this Court on April 22, 2005, and by letter that
same day the clerk of this Court notified appellant that the filing fee had not been paid, and
that failure to pay it could result in dismissal. Appellant filed an affidavit of indigence with
the trial court on April 25, 2005, pursuant to Rule 20.1 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.
1
This is an accelerated appeal pursuant to section 263.405(a) of the Texas Family
Code.
A motion requesting an extension of time to file appellant’s affidavit of indigence was filed
with this Court April 29, 2005. Tex. R. App. P. 10.5 (b), 20.1(c)(3).
On April 29, 2005, the trial court held a hearing pursuant to section 263.405(e) of
the Texas Family Code for the purpose of determining if appellant was indigent and
whether the appeal was frivolous, and to consider appellant’s motion for new trial. Tex.
Fam. Code Ann. § 263.405(e) (Vernon 2002). The trial court signed an order the same day
denying appellant’s motion for new trial, denying his request to proceed as indigent, and
finding his appeal to be frivolous. That order has not been appealed.2
The clerk of this Court notified appellant by letter on May 6, 2005, that his motion
for extension of time to file the affidavit of indigence was denied. He was directed by letter
to pay the filing fee on or before May 16, 2005. The letter again advised him that failure
to pay the filing fee could result in the appeal being dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P.
42.3(b), (c).
Appellant is not excused by statute or the Rules of Appellate Procedure from paying
costs. Tex. R. App. P. 5. Appellant has failed to comply with the requirement that he pay
the filing fee this Court is obligated to collect, and with this Court’s orders with respect to
2
Section 263.405 provides a procedure for appealing the trial court’s order denying
the appellant’s claim of indigence by filing with the appellate court the reporter’s record and
clerk’s record of the hearing no later than ten days after the date the trial court makes the
decision. Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 263.405(g). We received a reporter’s record of the
hearing May 23, 2005, twenty-four days after the date of the trial court’s decision. We
have not received a motion for extension of time to file the record. § 263.405(h). Nor have
we received any direct indication from appellant of a desire to appeal the trial court’s order
denying his claim of indigence.
2
the filing fee. All parties having had more than ten days’ notice that dismissal could result
from appellant’s continued failure to comply with the rules and this Court’s orders, the
appeal is dismissed. Tex. R. App. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c).
James T. Campbell
Justice
3