NO. 07-04-0363-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL A
JUNE 18, 2008
______________________________
IN RE NORTHWEST TEXAS HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC.
AND HARVEY ROSS SHADBOLT, CRNA, RELATORS
_________________________________
Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
          By opinion dated April 27, 2005, this Court conditionally granted a writ of mandamus in favor of Relators, Northwest Texas Healthcare System, Inc. and Harvey Ross Shadbolt, C.R.N.A. in a health care liability suit brought by Real Parties in Interest, Susan Roberts and John R. Roberts, Jr., individually and as next friends of their three minor children. Pursuant to § 13.01(g) of the Medical Liability and Insurance Improvement Act, the trial court granted the Roberts a thirty-day grace period in which to file their expert reports. This Court concluded that the expert reports were conclusory and thus, insufficient to support a grace period under § 13.01(g) and conditionally granted a writ of mandamus.
          On May 9, 2005, the Roberts filed a Petition for Writ of Mandamus in the Texas Supreme Court seeking relief from this Courtâs decision. Based on its recent decision in In re McAllen Medical Center, Inc., No. 05-0892, 2008 WL 2069837, 51 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 893 (Tex. May 16, 2008), on June 6, 2008, the Supreme Court held that this Court erred in granting Relatorsâ requested relief. Consequently, the Supreme Court conditionally granted mandamus relief in favor of the Roberts and directed this Court to vacate our previous order.
          Accordingly, we vacate our order of April 27, 2005 conditionally granting a writ of mandamus directing the Honorable Don Emerson, Judge of the 320th District Court to withdraw its prior order granting a thirty-day grace period to the Roberts in which to file their expert reports. We also deny the Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed by Relators, Northwest Texas Healthcare System, Inc. and Harvey Ross Shadbolt, C.R.N.A. on July 15, 2004.
                                                                           Per Curiam
"Medium List 1 Accent 1"/>
NO. 07-11-00115-CR
Â
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
Â
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Â
AT AMARILLO
Â
PANEL D
Â
APRIL 26, 2011
Â
Â
NICOLE C. FERGUSON, APPELLANT
Â
v.
Â
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
Â
Â
FROM THE 100TH DISTRICT COURT OF CARSON COUNTY;
Â
NO. 3701; HONORABLE DAN MIKE BIRD, JUDGE
Â
Â
Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.
Â
Â
ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND
Â
Appellant, Nicole C. Ferguson, appeals the trial courtÂs judgment adjudicating guilt for the offense of felony possession of marijuana.[1]Â The clerkÂs record contains a certification of appellantÂs right of appeal which was not signed by appellant.Â
Effective September 1, 2007, Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d) was amended to require certifications executed after the effective date to be signed by the appellant and a copy served on him. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); Mason v. State, No. 07-07-0383-CR, 2008 Tex. App. Lexis 3956 (Tex.App.--Amarillo May 29, 2008) (per curiam order, not designated for publication). Consequently, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the 100th District Court of Carson County for further proceedings. On remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means it finds necessary to secure and file with this court a certificate of right to appeal that complies with Rule 25.2(d). Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).
If necessary, the trial court shall execute findings of fact, conclusions of law, and any necessary orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues and cause its findings, conclusions, and orders, if any, as well as a conforming certificate of appellantÂs right of appeal to be included in a supplemental clerkÂs record. If the trial court conducts a hearing in the matter, it shall be stenographically recorded and the transcription included in a supplemental reporterÂs record. The trial court shall file the supplemental clerkÂs record and the supplemental reporterÂs record, if any, with the clerk of this court by May 26, 2010.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Â
Â
Do not publish.
          Â
[1] See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.121(a),(b)(5) (West 2010) (the knowing or intentional possession of a useable quantity of marijuana of 2,000 pounds or less but more than 50 pounds is a second degree felony). A second degree felony is punishable by imprisonment for a term of not more than 20 years or less than 2 years and a fine not to exceed $10,000. Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 12.33 (West Supp. 2010).