Jose A. Salazar v. State

NO. 07-09-0188-CR


IN THE COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


AT AMARILLO


PANEL C


JULY 20, 2009


______________________________



JOSE A. SALAZAR,


                                                                                                 Appellant


v.


THE STATE OF TEXAS,


                                                                                                 Appellee


_________________________________


FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;


NO. 2007-445,625; HON. RUSTY LADD, PRESIDING

_______________________________


Memorandum Opinion

_______________________________


Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

          Jose A. Salazar (appellant) appeals his conviction for driving while intoxicated. By letter dated June 11, 2009, we informed appellant that it appeared his notice of appeal was untimely and he had until June 22, 2009, to provide us with any information that would be necessary to our determination of jurisdiction. To date, no response has been filed. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

          To be timely, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after the sentence is imposed or suspended in open court or within 90 days after that date if a motion for new trial is filed. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a). In the case at bar, appellant was sentenced on April 30, 2009. No motion for new trial having been filed, appellant's notice of appeal was due to be filed June 1, 2009. Because the record discloses that appellant’s notice of appeal was received on June 4, 2009, without seeking an extension of the deadline, Tex. R. App. P. 26.3, the notice of appeal was late.

          A timely filed notice of appeal is essential to invoke our appellate jurisdiction. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). If it is untimely, we can take no action other than to dismiss the proceeding. Id. at 523. Appellant's notice being untimely filed, we have no jurisdiction over the matter and dismiss the appeal.

          Accordingly, appellant’s appeal is dismissed.                                                

 

                                                                           Brian Quinn

                                                                          Chief Justice




Do not publish.

>

Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's judgment.



Patrick A. Pirtle

Justice



Do not publish.

1. During final arguments, Appellant conceded that the State proved the remaining elements of the offense.