Rufus Sito Nanez, III v. State

NO. 07-09-0056-CR


IN THE COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


AT AMARILLO


PANEL B


FEBRUARY 13, 2009

______________________________


RUFUS SITO NANEZ, III,


                                                                                                 Appellant


v.


THE STATE OF TEXAS,


                                                                                                 Appellee

_________________________________


FROM THE 69th DISTRICT COURT OF MOORE COUNTY;


NO. 4077; HON. RON ENNS, PRESIDING

_______________________________


Order of Dismissal

_______________________________


Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

          Rufus Sito Nanez, III, appellant, attempts to appeal his conviction for two counts of aggravated sexual assault and burglary of a habitation. The court imposed sentence on December 10, 2008. His notice of appeal was filed on February 4, 2009. We dismiss for want of jurisdiction.

          To be timely, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after the sentence is imposed or suspended in open court or within 90 days after that date if a motion for new trial is filed. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a). No motion for new trial was filed.

          A timely filed notice of appeal is essential to invoke our appellate jurisdiction. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). If it is untimely, we can take no action other than to dismiss the proceeding. Id. at 523. Appellant's notice being untimely filed, we have no jurisdiction over the matter and dismiss the appeal.

          Accordingly, appellant’s appeal is dismissed.

 

                                                                           Brian Quinn

                                                                          Chief Justice




Do not publish.

ure hereafter will be by reference to "CCP_."