Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-14-00902-CR
Luis JARAMILLO, Jr.,
Appellant
v.
The STATE of TexasAppellee
The STATE of Texas,
Appellee
From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2012CR2228
Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding
Opinion by: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
Karen Angelini, Justice
Jason Pulliam, Justice
Delivered and Filed: September 9, 2015
AFFIRMED
Luis Jaramillo, Jr. pled true to violating the conditions of his community supervision, and
the trial court revoked his community supervision and sentenced him to ten years’ imprisonment.
Jaramillo’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief containing a professional evaluation of the record
in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel concludes that the appeal
has no merit. Counsel provided Jaramillo with a copy of the brief and informed him of his right
to review the record and file his own brief. See Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85-86 (Tex.
04-14-00902-CR
App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.—San
Antonio 1996, no pet.). Jaramillo obtained a copy of the record and filed a pro se brief.
After reviewing the record, counsel’s brief, and Jaramillo’s pro se brief, we agree that the
appeal is frivolous and without merit. 1 The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Appellate
counsel’s request to withdraw is granted. Nichols, 954 S.W.2d at 86; Bruns, 924 S.W.2d at 177
n.1. No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should Jaramillo wish to seek further review of this
case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, Jaramillo must either retain an attorney to file a
petition for discretionary review or Jaramillo must file a pro se petition for discretionary review.
Any petition for discretionary review must be filed within thirty days from the later of: (1) the date
of this opinion; or (2) the date the last timely motion for rehearing is overruled by this court. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed in the Texas Court of
Criminal Appeals. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.3. Any petition for discretionary review should comply
with the requirements of Rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 68.4.
Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
DO NOT PUBLISH
1
Because we have determined that the appeal is frivolous, we do not address any of the issues raised by Jaramillo in
his pro se brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
-2-