COURT OF APPEALS
EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO, TEXAS
)
NOE LEAL, ) No. 08-02-00034-CR
)
Appellant, ) Appeal from
)
v. ) 282nd District Court
)
THE STATE OF TEXAS, ) of Dallas County, Texas
)
Appellee. ) (TC# F-0149690-RS)
O P I N I O N
Noe Leal appeals his conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon. Appellant waived his right to a jury trial and entered a negotiated plea of guilty. The trial court found Appellant guilty, and pursuant to the plea bargain, assessed his punishment at a fine of $500 and imprisonment for a term of three years. We affirm.
Appellant=s court-appointed counsel has filed a brief in which he has concluded that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493, reh. denied, 388 U.S. 924, 87 S. Ct. 2094, 18 L. Ed. 2d 1377 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex.Crim.App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex.Crim.App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Crim.App. 1969). A copy of counsel=s brief has been delivered to Appellant, and Appellant has been advised of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.
The record reflects that Appellant was admonished of the consequences of his guilty plea pursuant to Article 26.13 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. Appellant made a judicial confession admitting his guilt. We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel=s brief, and agree that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. The judgment is affirmed.
October 17, 2002
ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice
Before Panel No. 1
Larsen, McClure, and Chew, JJ.
(Do Not Publish)