Gloria I. Carrillo v. Shamaley Ford, L. P. D/B/A Shamaley Ford, Ford Motor Service Company and Ford Motor Company

Becker v. State

COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS


)

GLORIA I. CARRILLO,                                     )                  No. 08-04-00362-CV

)

                                    Appellant,                        )                             Appeal from

)

v.                                                                          )                  34th District Court

)

SHAMALEY FORD, L.P. D/B/A                       )                  of El Paso County, Texas

SHAMALEY FORD, FORD MOTOR               )

SERVICE COMPANY, and                            )                  (TC# 2003-3913)

FORD MOTOR COMPANY,                             )

)

                                     Appellees.                        )


MEMORANDUM OPINION


            This appeal is before the court on its own motion for determination of whether it should be dismissed for want of prosecution. Finding that the Appellant has failed to file a brief or respond to our inquiry letter, we dismiss the appeal.

            On April 26, 2005, this Court informed Appellant by letter that its brief was past due and no motion for extension of time had been filed. The Court advised Appellant that the appeal would be dismissed unless it responded within ten days and provided a reason why the appeal should be continued. See Tex.R.App.P. 38.8. No reply has been filed.

            This court possesses the authority to dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution when appellant has failed to file his brief in the time prescribed, and gives no reasonable explanation for such failure. Tex.R.App.P. 38.8(a)(1); Elizondo v. City of San Antonio, 975 S.W.2d 61, 63 (Tex.App.--San Antonio 1998, no writ). We have given notice of our intent to do so, requested a response if a reasonable basis for failure to file the brief exists, and have received none. We see no purpose that would be served by declining to dismiss this appeal at this stage of the proceedings. Pursuant to Tex.R.App.P. 42.3(b), 42.3(c), and 38.8(a)(1), we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.


June 9, 2005                                                               

                                                                                    ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice


Before Barajas, C.J., McClure, and Chew, JJ.