Legal Research AI

in the Interest of J. O. v. N. J. v. K. E. v. C. v. E. v. and J. v. Children

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date filed: 2009-09-23
Citations:
Copy Citations
Click to Find Citing Cases
Combined Opinion
                                    COURT OF APPEALS
                                 EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
                                      EL PASO, TEXAS

                                                 §
                                                                  No. 08-09-00173-CV
 IN THE INTEREST OF J.O.V., N.J.V.,              §
 K.E.V., C.V., E.V., and J.V., children.                            Appeal from the
                                                 §
                                                                   65th District Court
                                                 §
                                                                of El Paso County, Texas
                                                 §
                                                                  (TC# 2007CM6716)
                                                 §

                                     MEMORANDUM OPINION

       This appeal is before the Court on its own motion for determination of whether it should be

dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See TEX .R.APP .P. 42.3(a). Finding that no notice of appeal was

filed, we will dismiss the appeal.

       A civil appeal is perfected when the notice of appeal is filed. TEX .R.APP .P. 26.1; see

Restrepo v. First Nat’l Bank of Dona Ana County, N.M., 892 S.W.2d 237, 238 (Tex.App.–El Paso

1995, no writ) (applying former TEX .R.APP .P. 40(a)(1)). In accelerated cases such as this one, the

notice of appeal must be filed within twenty days after the judgment is signed. TEX .R.APP .P.

26.1(b). The filing of a motion for new trial does not extend the time to perfect the appeal in

accelerated cases, nor does a motion to modify the judgment. TEX .R.APP .P. 28.1(b); In re K.A.F.,

160 S.W.3d 923, 927 (Tex. 2005). A notice of appeal is considered timely if filed within fifteen days

of the due date and accompanied by a reasonable explanation for the failure to file on the due date.

Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Unless a timely notice of appeal has been

filed, we lack jurisdiction over the appeal. Wagner & Brown, Ltd. v. Horwood, 58 S.W.3d 732, 737-

38 (Tex. 2001).
       The record reflects that the trial court entered its judgment on June 8, 2009, and Appellant

received notice of the signing of the final judgment on June 23, 2009. On June 29, 2009, Appellant

filed a motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal, contending that additional time was needed

to file an affidavit of indigence. This Court granted the motion on July 1, 2009, but ordered that the

notice of appeal and affidavit of indigence be filed by July 13, 2009. Neither a notice of appeal nor

affidavit of indigence has been filed.

       In Grand Praire, the Supreme Court held that a court of appeals may not dismiss an appeal

in which the appellant filed the wrong instrument required to perfect the appeal without giving the

appellant an opportunity to correct the error, as long as the instrument was timely filed in a bona fide

attempt to invoke the appellate court’s jurisdiction. Grand Prairie Indep. Sch. Dist. v. S. Parts

Imps., Inc., 813 S.W.2d 499, 500 (Tex. 1991). Assuming Appellant’s motion to extend time to file

the notice of appeal and affidavit of indigence was a bona fide attempt to invoke this Court’s

jurisdiction, Appellant, as discussed above, was given the opportunity to file a correct notice of

appeal and affidavit of indigence. Appellant has not done so. Absent a notice of appeal, we lack

jurisdiction over the appeal. The appeal, therefore, is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.



                                               GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice
September 23, 2009

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.