COURT OF APPEALS
EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO, TEXAS
MARK ANTHONY RODRIGUEZ, §
No. 08-09-00108-CR
Appellant, §
Appeal from the
v. §
227th District Court
THE STATE OF TEXAS, §
of Bexar County, Texas
Appellee. §
(TC#2008CR0883W)
§
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an appeal from a judgment adjudicating Appellant guilty of the offense of possession
of heroin in an amount less than one gram. The court sentenced Appellant to two years’ confinement
in a state jail facility. We affirm.
Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a brief in which she has concluded that the
appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, reh. denied, 388 U.S. 924, 87 S.Ct. 2094,
18 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967), by advancing contentions which counsel says might arguably support the
appeal. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684
(Tex.Crim.App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex.Crim.App. 1972); Gainous v. State,
436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Crim.App. 1969). A copy of counsel’s brief has been delivered to Appellant,
and Appellant has been advised of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se brief.
No pro se brief has been filed.
We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is wholly
frivolous and without merit. Further, we find nothing in the record that might arguably support the
appeal. The judgment is affirmed.
GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice
September 23, 2009
Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.
(Do Not Publish)