COURT OF APPEALS
EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO, TEXAS
GUILLERMO CARDENAS, §
No. 08-08-00206-CR
Appellant, §
Appeal from the
v. §
County Court at Law No. Four
THE STATE OF TEXAS, §
of El Paso County, Texas
Appellee. §
(TC#20070C05666)
§
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an appeal from a jury conviction for the offense of assault causes bodily injury family
violence. TEX .PENAL CODE ANN . § 22.01(a)(1)(Vernon Supp. 2008). The court assessed
confinement for 150 days. We affirm.
Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a brief in which she has concluded that the
appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, reh. denied, 388 U.S. 924, 87 S.Ct. 2094,
18 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why,
in effect, there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807
(Tex.Crim.App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex.Crim.App. 1974); Jackson v. State,
485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex.Crim.App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Crim.App. 1969).
A copy of counsel’s brief and the appellate record have been delivered to Appellant, and
Appellant has been advised of his right to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.
We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is wholly
frivolous and without merit. Further, we find nothing in the record that might arguably support the
appeal.
The judgment is affirmed.
GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice
June 3, 2009
Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.
(Do Not Publish)