Ex Parte Michael Wayne Osborne

In The



Court of Appeals



Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont



____________________



NO. 09-04-487 CR

____________________



EX PARTE MICHAEL WAYNE OSBORNE




On Appeal from the 252nd District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2021




MEMORANDUM OPINION (1)

On November 15, 2004, the trial court denied Michael Wayne Osborne's application for writ of habeas corpus without conducting an evidentiary hearing or issuing the writ of habeas corpus. We questioned our jurisdiction over the appeal. Osborne filed responses which he admits no hearing was conducted and in which he argues the merits of his application for writ of habeas corpus.

No appeal lies from the refusal to issue writ of habeas corpus unless the trial court conducts an evidentiary hearing on the merits of the application. Ex parte Hargett, 819 S.W.2d 866 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Noe v. State, 646 S.W.2d 230 (Tex. Crim. App. 1983). The trial court did not issue a writ of habeas corpus, nor did the court conduct an evidentiary hearing on the application for the writ. Compare Ex parte Silva, 968 S.W.2d 367 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Ex parte McCullough, 966 S.W.2d 529 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). We hold we have no jurisdiction over this appeal. Accordingly, it is ordered that the appeal be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM



Opinion Delivered December 22, 2004

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Burgess and Gaultney, JJ.

1. Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.