Carroll Clary v. State

Summarize
Check Treatment

Related Cases

In The



Court of Appeals



Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont



____________________



NO. 09-05-373 CR

____________________



CARROLL CLARY, Appellant



V.



THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee



On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 248315



MEMORANDUM OPINION

On October 13, 2005, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record or the appellant explained why he needed time for filing the record. The appellant did not file a response. It appears that the appellant is not entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 20.2. There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the record, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

_____________________________

STEVE McKEITHEN

Chief Justice



Opinion Delivered December 7, 2005

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.