In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
____________________
NO. 09-06-438 CR
____________________
ROSE MARY MOSS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Jefferson County, Texas
Trial Cause No. 93011
A jury found appellant Rose Mary Moss guilty of injury to a child and assessed punishment at ten years of imprisonment.
Moss's appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel's professional evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). On July 26, 2007, we granted an extension of time for appellant to file a pro se brief. We received no response from appellant.
We reviewed the appellate record, and we agree with counsel's conclusion that no arguable issues support an appeal. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Compare Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court's judgment. (1)
AFFIRMED.
STEVE McKEITHEN
Chief Justice
Submitted on November 5, 2007
Opinion Delivered November 28, 2007
Do Not Publish
Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Horton, JJ.
1. Appellant may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for
discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.