In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
______________________
NO. 09-07-117 CR
______________________
ROBERT CHAVEZ, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
Jefferson County, Texas
Trial Cause No. 89694
Pursuant to a plea bargain, appellant Robert Chavez pled guilty to burglary of a building. On January 3, 2006, the trial court found the evidence sufficient to find Chavez guilty, but deferred further proceedings, placed Chavez on community supervision for three years, assessed a fine of $750, and ordered Chavez to pay restitution of $170.55. On May 11, 2006, the State filed a motion to revoke Chavez's unadjudicated community supervision. Chavez pled "true" to three violations of the conditions of his community supervision. The trial court found that Chavez violated the conditions of his community supervision, found Chavez guilty of burglary of a building, and assessed punishment at two years of confinement in a state jail facility.
Chavez's appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel's professional evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). On July 12, 2007, we granted an extension of time for appellant to file a pro se brief. We received no response from appellant. We reviewed the appellate record, and we agree with counsel's conclusion that no arguable issues support an appeal. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Compare Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court's judgment. (1)
AFFIRMED.
_________________________________
DAVID GAULTNEY
Justice
Submitted on November 5, 2007
Opinion Delivered November 28, 2007
Do not publish
Before Gaultney, Kreger, and Horton, JJ.
1. Appellant may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.