Pursuant to a plea bargain, appellant Jeremy Lewing pled guilty to assault on a family member. The trial court found the evidence sufficient to find Lewing guilty, but deferred further proceedings, placed Lewing on community supervision for three years, and assessed a fine of $500. On October 24, 2006, the State filed a motion to revoke Lewing's unadjudicated community supervision. Lewing pled "true" to three violations of the conditions of his community supervision. The trial court found that Lewing violated the conditions of his community supervision, found Lewing guilty of assault on a family member, and assessed punishment at ten years of confinement.
Lewing's appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel's professional evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). On April 5, 2007, we granted an extension of time for appellant to file a pro se brief. We received no response from appellant. We reviewed the appellate record, and we agree with counsel's conclusion that no arguable issues support an appeal. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Compare Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court's judgment. (1)
AFFIRMED.
__________________________________
CHARLES KREGER
Justice
Submitted on July 2, 2007
Opinion Delivered July 11, 1007
Do not publish
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger, and Horton, JJ.
1. Appellant may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.